What are the arguments surrounding inequality and growth from the neoclassical economic perspective and from an alternative perspective? See “Geese, Golden Eggs, and Trapps” in TWER, pg 106, and refer to the Scully article on Canvas. What evidence is available to support arguments either way? Use the Lindert article on Canvas or any info that you can reference on the performance of the economy during eras of lower inequality vs. those of higher.