1. Procedural History: How did this case get to this particular court? Who is appealing on what issues? What happened in the lower court?
2. Facts: This section of your brief contains a statement of the relevant facts of the case, in your own words.
3. Issues: The issue is the legal question the court is trying to answer in the case. Quite often the court will not state the issue explicitly. Phrase the issue as a question, as narrowly and accurately as possible. It is not sufficient, for example, to ask whether the defendant is liable or whether the judgment of the lower court should be reversed.
4. Judgment: This is the court’s holding, i.e., what the court ultimately decided or for which party it ruled. The judgment should answer the question posed as the issue.
5. Reasons: This is your synopsis of why the court decided the case as it did. Describe in your own words.
5. Critique: Provide your opinion of the case and outcome.
Then you must answer these questions below:
1) Using the legal brief outline posted under Week 1, complete a brief for the following case from Chapter One: Sidis v. F-R Publishing Corp.
2) Using the legal brief outline posted under Week 1, complete a brief for the following case from Chapter One: Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
3) Being a veteran of the first lecture of IT331, New Jersey Institute of Technology has asked you to create a new campus privacy policy. It is up to you to determine what will be deemed private for your fellow students and what will not. Write your policy and be prepared to defend it in class.
4) Do you think individual privacy should ever be compromised for the sake of public interest? If not, why not? If so, what public interests would qualify? Where would you draw the line?
The Book that I am using for answer those question above:
"Privacy, Information and Technology" 3 Edition, By Daniel Solove and Paul schwartz.
any more question related to this assignment just email me back.